Euthanasia Legalization

Euthanasia Legalization By Renee Rosenkilde Rosenkilde 1 Although the unify States, and the rest of the world, have made astounding inventions and break bys in technology, health precaution is still subject to criticism. Even in the twenty-first century, there are numerous terminal, chronic, and life threating diseases circling the world. Because of these circumstances, when a long-suffering is diagnosed with a painful disease that lead kill them in a short list of time, they should be allowed to decide how they want to end their life waiting for the disease to kill them, or straight receiving support suicide and ending their pain immediately.Through the process of active mercy killing, a person diagnosed with a terminal illness can immediately evanesce. Active euthanasia would allow a person with a terminal illness to be administered a lethal medication which give instantly kill them and release them from their suffering. other form of assisted suicide, passive euthanasia , is eliminating any medical assistance in keeping a unhurried alive, until their death.Active euthanasia should be legalized because it is legal according to the constitution, it is a less expensive alternative, certain religions partake in the act of active euthanasia, and overall it will allow a terminally ill and suffering patient role to end their distress. Active euthanasia should be legalized end-to-end the joined States because it is legal according to the Constitution. Currently, assisted suicide is and legal in the states of Washington, Oregon, and Montana (ND NA wrtl. org).Active euthanasia would allow a citizen of the United States a painless death, and an allotted time to say goodbye to their friends and family members. Once consent is given from either the patient themselves, or the family, active Rosenkilde 2 euthanasia should be a possibility for someone with a terminal chronic illness. Steven Ertlet comments, The bereaved family and friends of cancer patients w ho died by euthanasia coped better with respect to grief symptoms and post-traumatic stress reactions than the bereaved of comparable cancer patients who died a natural death. (ND Ertlet paragraph 1). Whereas passive euthanasia would contribute to an extensive total of pain and suffering, active euthanasia would allow for an immediate, accessible, and painless death. The Constitution of the United States says, certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. whenever any form of administration becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it. The United States Constitution grants its citizens the right to pursue happiness, which in some cases may be through active euthanasia.The Constitution restates this idea in a to a greater extent precise form in the Due Process Clause first section of the fourteenth amendment No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immu nities of citizens of the United States nor shall any state deprive any person ofliberty, or property, without due process of law nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. The Constitution states that if it is a persons need to die through active euthanasia, it shall be provided to them through to the Due Process Law first section of the fourteenth amendment.In the case that active euthanasia would be the trounce option for a United States citizen struggling with a terminal illness, active euthanasia should be considered. Euthanasia should be legalized in the United States, because it would allow for a citizen with a terminal illness a quick and painless death as well as abide to the Unites States Constitution. Rosenkilde 3 With the declining economy in the United States, saving notes and cutting unnecessary spending is of great importance.With health spending accounting for over 17% GDP how much a direct produces in some amount of time in the United States, it is the highest in the world (NA ND data. wordlbank. org). Cutting this percentage as much as possible would drastically improve the Untied States economy. The money spent in hospitals is used to cure patients with different illnesses. Although this is thoughtful on Americas part, in party cases it is unnecessary. If a patient is diagnosed with an incurable terminal illness, there is not much point in wasting money to keep them suffering for as long as possible.Mpoziemski, an online debater at euthanasia. procon. org comments, Is it not more compassionate to end a humans suffering then to make them hold on only to die later after a long, drawn out pain filled battle? (Mpoziemski 2012 paragraph 1). Keeping a patient suffering until they die of natural causes is irrational when it is possible through active euthanasia to end their suffering as soon as possible. As an added note, this would also help save money throughout this country in drastic numbers. Once approval is given for active euthanasia to be administered, it is can easily save the patient and the hospital money.Certain cancer treatments can be as costly as $10,000, which is added to the accumulating bill for doctor visits, lab tests, room charges, imaging tests, radiation treatments, drugs and other medicines, take up care, surgery, and homecare (NA ND cancer. org/treatment). Prolonging the life of a patient with an illness is costly for both the hospital and the patient. Instead of paying money to suffer for a longer amount of time, a person with a terminal illness can receive active euthanasia and avoid both the physical and financial pain.Rosenkilde 4 The United States was originally a British colony which British citizens fled to for religious withdrawdom. America seemed as a place where everybody could freely practice their religion. Therefore, when the United States liberated themself from immense Britain, the basis of this country was found off of the freedom of r eligion. The first amendment of the United States Constitution says Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof (www. archieves. ov amendment 1). According toreligions. pewform. org, Judaism, a religion that over 2% of all American adults practice, accepts the idea of suicide in certain circumstances. A horizontal surface in the Torah tells of a young man who was told by God to displume suicide in order to end his suffering. The story tells of a young man who was being burned alive by the Romans, and god tells him to end his suffering by breathing in large amount of smoke and flames to kill him more quickly. Also, Jewish people do not associate suicide as murder.Although the Torah explains breaking one of the Ten Commandments thou shalt not kill as a sin, suicide does not abide by this commandment, and therefore is not considered a sin. Another main religion in the United States is Hinduism. Practiced mainly by Ameri cans of Indian decent, this religion has ancient suicidal practices. One physical exercise of this is called suttee. This is a ritual practice throughout India in which a wife will commit suicide after her husbands death so that he would have a partner in the afterlife. suttee the Indian custom of a widow burning herself, either on the funeral pyre of her dead husband or in some other fashion, soon after his death. (http//www. britannica. com/EBchecked/topic/575795/suttee). Another example of Hindu suicide is the practice of prayopavesa. Prayopavesa is when a Hindu will fast (not eat food) until their death. This practice is used under certain circumstances only for the sacredly advanced. Rosenkilde 5 Prayopavesa is only used when a person has an incurable terminal illness. Not consuming any food or water will at long last kill the person, most likely faster than the illness would have.The Hindu religion believes in the concept of karma good or bad luck generated by your action s. near Hindus believe that a person who helps other end a painful life and thereby reduce suffering is doing a good deed and will gain good karma. (http//www. religionfacts. com/euthanasia/hinduism. htm). In all, the United States was based off of freedom of religion, and this concept has been encoded in the first amendment of the constitution. Therefore, if a religion accepts and enforces the practice of assisted suicide (active euthanasia), then it should be legalized throughout the United States.Although active euthanasia is a politically and religiously controversial topic, research can conclude that euthanasia should be legalized across the United States. Due to the fact that the United States Constitution accepts the use of euthanasia, it cannot be ruled as illegal. As well, the United States Constitution, and the entire country, was based off of the freedom of religion. Therefore, if certain major religions accept, and encourage the use of active euthanasia, than the medic al procedure should be legalized across the nation so that these religious practices may take place in a safe medical environment.As well, active euthanasia should be legalized because it can save a great deal of money across the United States. With over 17% of GDP used on hospitals and the medical world, taking a person out of their misery would be more effective and less costly. The costs for doctor visits, lab tests, room charges, imaging tests, radiation treatments, drugs and other medicines, nurse care, surgery, and homecare accumulate to increasingly high bills for both the patient and the hospital. Finally, and most importantly, the practice of active euthanasia can quickly, easily, and effectively take a patient with a terminal Rosenkilde 6 llness out of their pain and misery with an allotted time to say goodbye to their loved ones. With a patient dying due to a disease anyways, wouldnt it make more mother wit to end their life quickly and easily instead of keeping them ali ve to endure a life of pain? Active euthanasia should be legalized throughout the United States, and should be made an option for anyone with a miserable, chronic, long-term, terminal illness. Works Cited http//www. lifenews. com/2003/07/20/bio-21/ http//www. wrtl. org/assistedsuicide/assistedsuicide/whereitislegalus. aspx http//www. law. cornell. edu/constitution/amendmentxiv ttp//www. fed-soc. org/publications/detail/whether-there-is-a-constitutional-right-to-die http//www. ushistory. org/declaration/document/ http//euthanasia. procon. org/view. answers. php? questionID=000207 http//www. cancer. org/treatment/findingandpayingfortreatment/managinginsuranceissues/the-cost-of-cancer-treatment http//data. worldbank. org/indicator/SH. XPD. TOTL. ZS http//www. religionfacts. com/euthanasia/hinduism. htm http//www. archives. gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript. html http//www. britannica. com/EBchecked/topic/575795/suttee http//religions. pewforum. org/reports